15 Best Architecture SEO Companies 2026, Ranked by the SEO Contextual Density Index
You found this page on Google, or an AI answer sent you here.
That’s the work. We can do the same for your architecture practice.
An architecture practice looking for an SEO company meets the same page over and over: a ranking of agencies, published by an agency that put itself on top. Those pages state no method. This one states its method, publishes its constants, and scores every agency on one instrument. The SEO Contextual Density Index reads five properties of a page and of the firm behind it, and it weights vocabulary heaviest because that is what our measurements keep pointing at. For an architecture firm that means something specific: whether an agency writes about portfolios, project pages, residential and commercial practice, developers, renovation work, zoning and the RFP, or only about SEO. The index is partial and we say so. ProStar SEO publishes this table, and ProStar SEO prints its own row at whatever rank the instrument gives it, in this edition and in every edition after, including the editions where the row sits outside the top fifteen.
The architecture SEO market, measured
Fifteen quality agencies compete for “seo for architects” in the United States; there are others, and this table covers the ones the live SERP put in front of an architecture practice. The keyword carries informational intent, so the first twenty results are mostly guides, software vendors and forum threads rather than agencies selling to architects, and the read had to run to depth 60 to find fourteen agency service pages. We measured those fourteen plus our own, against one 172-term list built from what the competitors write about architecture firms.
ProStar SEO places first at 70.9, 13.1 ahead of Abstrakt Marketing Group: 159 of 172 terms covered against 92, and 64 of them in the title or headings against 31. Those terms are the working vocabulary of an architecture practice as much as of SEO: portfolio and project pages, residential and commercial work, interior and landscape practice, developers, renovation, permitting and zoning. WebFX and Abstrakt Marketing Group win footprint, near 86 against our 41.2, on brand search volume our page cannot match. Our page sits eleventh in the live SERP for the anchor, and the table prints that position beside the score without adjusting one for the other.
No score on this page is computed from another row. Each agency’s five pillars come from its own page and its own public footprint, against constants fixed before the edition ran.
The indexAI answersCharacteristicsFrenchThe 15 agenciesHow to chooseQuestions to ask
The short version
Top of the index
- 1ProStar SEO70.9
- 2Abstrakt Marketing Group57.8
- 3Bird Marketing54.1
The 15 agencies measured (index rank · live US SERP position, 2026-09-19)
- 1ProStar SEOpos. 11
- 2Abstrakt Marketing Grouppos. 46
- 3Bird Marketingpos. 53
- 4Awkward Mediapos. 45
- 5Elsner Technologiespos. 22
- 6HeeDee Studiospos. 15
- 7WebFXpos. 26
- 8Uncommonpos. 43
- 9Softtrixpos. 51
- 10Loganixpos. 35
- 11uClimbpos. 28
- 12New Deezpos. 12
- 13Digital Shiftpos. 48
- 14The Gallas Companypos. 49
- 15Rankpatherpos. 42
Full tables below: the index (ten columns) and the characteristics (twelve columns), both sortable.
Why contextual density is the yardstick
Contextual density measures how much of a market’s working vocabulary a page actually uses, as a share of its own words. It is not keyword density and it is not word count. A 6,000-word guide that returns to the same dozen phrases scores lower than a 2,000-word service page that covers the market’s full range once each, which is why the efficiency pillar exists alongside it.
Architecture makes the point cleanly, because the vocabulary is the practice. An architecture firm choosing an agency asks about portfolio and project pages, about residential versus commercial work, about interior and landscape practice, about developers and general contractors, about renovation and adaptive reuse, about permitting and zoning, about the RFP a civic or institutional client will run, and about map-pack visibility for the searches a homeowner types. A page that answers all of that uses the industry’s words because it has to. A page that repeats “SEO for architects” forty times has told an architect nothing about architecture.
Contextual density explained in five minutes →How the index scores
Coveragedistinct list terms on the page ÷ 172, as a percentage
Density100 × CD ÷ (CD + 10); this cohort’s median of 47.6% scores 83
Structureshare of the page’s distinct list terms that also appear in the title, H1, H2 or H3
Footprintbranded search volume (US, ceiling 10,000/mo) and Google reviews weighted by rating (ceiling 500), log-scaled, averaged
Efficiency100 × min(1, 3 ÷ repetition index); at or below 3 scores 100
Bars are drawn against the heaviest signal. The five weights sum to 100.
⇅ Sortable tables: click a column header to sort, again to reverse; the # column restores the ranking. Hover a header for the metric’s definition and source.
| # | Agency | Pos. | SCDI | Coverage terms /172 | Density CD % | Efficiency rep. index | Structure placed/distinct | Footprint brand · reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ProStar SEO | 11 | 70.9 | 92.4 159 | 58.5 14.11% | 100 2.78 | 40 64/159 | 41.2 20 · 25 |
| 2 | Abstrakt Marketing Group | 46 | 57.8 | 50.0 86 | 57.6 13.58% | 100 2.48 | 23 20/86 | 85.6 1,900 · 363 |
| 3 | Bird Marketing | 53 | 54.1 | 52.9 91 | 57.0 13.26% | 89 3.37 | 27 25/91 | 56.9 140 · 41 |
| 4 | Awkward Media | 45 | 53.8 | 51.7 89 | 51.1 10.46% | 93 3.22 | 22 20/89 | 67.6 140 · 195 |
| 5 | Elsner Technologies | 22 | 52.5 | 52.9 91 | 44.6 8.05% | 87 3.46 | 34 31/91 | 57.3 30 · 233 |
| 6 | HeeDee Studios | 15 | 48.9 | 53.5 92 | 57.3 13.44% | 48 6.23 | 33 30/92 | 42.0 20 · 26 |
| 7 | WebFX | 26 | 47.0 | 33.7 58 | 51.0 10.40% | 88 3.41 | 10 6/58 | 86.3 6,600 · 205 |
| 8 | Uncommon | 43 | 46.0 | 34.3 59 | 50.2 10.07% | 100 2.80 | 31 18/59 | 51.1 110 · no listing |
| 9 | Softtrix | 51 | 45.5 | 41.9 72 | 35.4 5.48% | 99 3.04 | 7 5/72 | 71.8 140 · 336 |
| 10 | Loganix | 35 | 44.5 | 39.0 67 | 50.5 10.20% | 71 4.25 | 13 9/67 | 64.8 390 · no listing |
| 11 | uClimb | 28 | 43.4 | 42.4 73 | 45.2 8.24% | 79 3.78 | 25 18/73 | 38.4 20 · 16 |
| 12 | New Deez | 12 | 42.8 | 36.6 63 | 53.9 11.67% | 100 2.22 | 16 10/63 | 33.1 20 · no listing |
| 13 | Digital Shift | 48 | 42.2 | 37.2 64 | 47.6 9.07% | 100 2.41 | 19 12/64 | 33.1 20 · no listing |
| 14 | The Gallas Company | 49 | 31.5 | 25.0 43 | 45.2 8.26% | 90 3.33 | 23 10/43 | 0.0 0 · no listing |
| 15 | Rankpather | 42 | 30.7 | 24.4 42 | 47.5 9.03% | 100 2.33 | 10 4/42 | 0.0 0 · no listing |
Who shows up in AI answers
AI presence here is a countable figure: the number of US keywords for which Google’s AI Overview cites each domain, from the Semrush index on 2026-09-19. Nothing is scored from it; it’s printed because a buyer choosing an SEO agency in 2026 wants to know who the machines already quote. WebFX is cited on 2,156 keywords, Loganix is cited on 644 keywords, ProStar SEO on 120. Bars are log-scaled, so a bar half as long is roughly a count forty times smaller.
Semrush “AI Overview positions”, us database: keywords where the domain appears as a cited source inside the AI Overview. A related figure, keywords the domain ranks for whose SERP carries an AI Overview, runs about ten times higher for every member and is not what’s shown here.
What you’d want to know before calling them
Nothing in this table is scored. It’s the set of facts the ranking pages on this query print about each agency, collected the same way for all fifteen and tagged by source in each column header: stated means the agency says so on its own site and the bracket links to where; public record means Google Maps or Clutch; a measured count comes from the Semrush index on the pull date. Where a fact isn’t public it says so rather than guessing.
| # | Agency | HQ stated | Founded stated | Team stated | Pricing stated | Google rating (n) | Clutch rating (n) | Architecture vertical | French published | AI Overview citations | Page-1 keywords | Notable clients as stated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ProStar SEO | Quebec City, QC | — | — | not published | 4.7 (25) | — | page only | — | 120 | 0 | none named |
| 2 | Abstrakt Marketing Group | St. Louis, MO [source] | — | — | not published | 4.7 (363) | — | page only | — | 120 | 0 | none named |
| 3 | Bird Marketing | — | — | — | not published | 5.0 (41) | — | page only | — | 200 | 0 | none named |
| 4 | Awkward Media | Toronto, ON [source] | — | — | not published | 4.8 (195) | — | page only | — | 10 | 0 | none named |
| 5 | Elsner Technologies | Ahmedabad, India [source] | — | — | not published | 4.4 (233) | — | page only | — | 323 | 0 | none named |
| 6 | HeeDee Studios | — | — | — | not published | 4.8 (26) | — | page only | — | 13 | 0 | none named |
| 7 | WebFX | Harrisburg, PA [source] | — | 750 [source] | not published | 4.5 (205) | — | page only | — | 2,156 | 0 | none named |
| 8 | Uncommon | — | — | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 0 | 0 | none named |
| 9 | Softtrix | — | 2009 [source] | — | not published | 4.8 (336) | — | page only | — | 580 | 0 | none named |
| 10 | Loganix | — | — | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 644 | 0 | none named |
| 11 | uClimb | London, United Kingdom [source] | — | — | £450-£950+VAT per month | 4.8 (16) | — | page only | — | 0 | 0 | none named |
| 12 | New Deez | — | — | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 1 | 0 | none named |
| 13 | Digital Shift | — | 2007 [source] | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 60 | 0 | none named |
| 14 | The Gallas Company | Winter Garden, FL [source] | 2014 [source] | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 0 | 0 | none named |
| 15 | Rankpather | — | — | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 1 | 0 | none named |
The 15 agencies in detail
One block each, same template, same length, publisher included. Screenshot is the measured page above the fold on the capture date. Facts are the agency’s own statements with the page linked; the measurement sentence is computed from the table above.
1. ProStar SEO
Who they are. ProStar SEO is a bilingual Canadian SEO agency that publishes this index. It sells SEO and GEO programmes by industry, architecture among them, and prints its own row on the same instrument as everyone else.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): architecture, and other verticals.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 159 of the 172 market terms (92% coverage) over 4,599 words at 14.11% contextual density, repeating each term 2.78 times on average, which is 159 of the 172 market terms, with 64 of them reaching the title or a heading. HeeDee Studios and Elsner run the next-widest vocabularies, at 92 and 91 terms, on pages roughly twice as long. The footprint pillar is where the page loses, with 20 US brand searches a month and 25 reviews on the Quebec City listing.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Local SEO, Technical SEO, Content, Link building, GEO / AI visibility. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): practices that want a measured content programme in English or French, and an agency that publishes the measurement.
2. Abstrakt Marketing Group
Who they are. Abstrakt Marketing Group is a B2B lead generation company that bundles SEO with appointment setting and outbound sales across more than a hundred industries. Architecture is one of them.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): 100+ B2B industries.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 86 of the 172 market terms (50% coverage) over 2,043 words at 13.58% contextual density, repeating each term 2.48 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 100 and its weakest is structure at 23, and it sits at position 46 on Google against 2 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: B2B appointment setting, Cold calling, SEO, Web design, Paid media, Talent solutions. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): firms that want SEO bundled with outbound sales and appointment setting rather than as a standalone programme.
3. Bird Marketing
Who they are. Bird Marketing is an award-winning full-service digital agency operating across UK, US, UAE and Asian markets. Architecture sits in a long industries list beside pharmaceutical, SaaS, telecoms and travel.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): pharmaceutical, SaaS, telecoms, tourism, transport, architecture.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 91 of the 172 market terms (53% coverage) over 2,890 words at 13.26% contextual density, repeating each term 3.37 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 89 and its weakest is structure at 27, and it sits at position 53 on Google against 3 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Paid advertising, Social media, Web design, Branding. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): practices working across several countries that want one agency for search, paid and social.
4. Awkward Media
Who they are. Awkward Media is a Toronto SEO agency with an industries menu that includes architecture. Its architects page argues against traffic as a success metric and for project leads instead.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): architecture, law, healthcare, e-commerce.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 89 of the 172 market terms (52% coverage) over 3,921 words at 10.46% contextual density, repeating each term 3.22 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 93 and its weakest is structure at 22, and it sits at position 45 on Google against 4 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Local SEO, Technical SEO, Content, PPC. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): Canadian practices that want lead quality argued about rather than traffic charts.
5. Elsner Technologies
Who they are. Elsner Technologies is an Indian software and marketing company with a US office in Fremont, California. SEO sits beside custom software, e-commerce development and AI consulting rather than standing on its own.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): e-commerce, software, general.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 91 of the 172 market terms (53% coverage) over 5,675 words at 8.05% contextual density, repeating each term 3.46 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 87 and its weakest is structure at 34, and it sits at position 22 on Google against 5 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Performance marketing, E-commerce development, Custom software, AI strategy consulting, Magento extensions. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): firms that need development work and marketing from the same supplier.
6. HeeDee Studios
Who they are. HeeDee Studios is a small UK web design and SEO studio whose architects page is written in the first person. Its service menu is dominated by city-level web design pages across Cardiff, London, Manchester and Birmingham.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): general small business.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 92 of the 172 market terms (53% coverage) over 6,446 words at 13.44% contextual density, repeating each term 6.23 times on average, its strongest pillar is density at 57 and its weakest is structure at 33, and it sits at position 15 on Google against 6 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Web design, SEO, Logo design, E-commerce. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): small UK practices that want a website and its SEO from one small studio.
7. WebFX
Who they are. WebFX is a large US full-service digital marketing agency selling SEO across dozens of industry verticals. Architecture is one page inside a professional-services category.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): professional services, e-commerce, healthcare, and dozens more.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 58 of the 172 market terms (34% coverage) over 2,697 words at 10.40% contextual density, repeating each term 3.41 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 88 and its weakest is structure at 10, and it sits at position 26 on Google against 7 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, PPC, Web design, Content marketing, Social media, Analytics. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): larger firms that want a big agency with a long track record and are comfortable being one vertical among many.
8. Uncommon
Who they are. Uncommon works only with architecture firms, selling business development, branding, lead generation and SEO as one programme. It is the only cohort member whose entire company is built around this industry.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): architecture.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 59 of the 172 market terms (34% coverage) over 2,304 words at 10.07% contextual density, repeating each term 2.80 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 100 and its weakest is structure at 31, and it sits at position 43 on Google against 8 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Business development, Branding, SEO and local SEO, Lead generation, Web design, Public relations. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): practices that want an agency working only with architecture firms, across business development as well as search.
9. Softtrix
Who they are. Softtrix is a performance marketing agency with offices listed in Austin and Dublin that sells SEO, PPC and social across industries. Its architect page is one of many vertical landing pages.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): e-commerce, beauty, general.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 72 of the 172 market terms (42% coverage) over 4,767 words at 5.48% contextual density, repeating each term 3.04 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 99 and its weakest is structure at 7, and it sits at position 51 on Google against 9 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, PPC, Social media marketing, Content, E-commerce marketing. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): firms comparing on price that want a broad performance-marketing menu.
10. Loganix
Who they are. Loganix sells SEO deliverables wholesale to other agencies and in-house teams rather than to architecture firms directly. Its architects page is a marketing guide published on a service URL.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): agencies, resellers, in-house teams.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 67 of the 172 market terms (39% coverage) over 4,198 words at 10.20% contextual density, repeating each term 4.25 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 71 and its weakest is structure at 13, and it sits at position 35 on Google against 10 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Link building, Content, SEO audits, Citations, White-label fulfilment, Reseller programme. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): in-house marketers and other agencies buying SEO deliverables wholesale.
11. uClimb
Who they are. UClimb is a London SEO agency that publishes a detailed architecture SEO guide on a service URL, complete with retainer pricing. It is the only member of the cohort that states what architecture SEO costs.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): architecture, general UK SME.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 73 of the 172 market terms (42% coverage) over 5,485 words at 8.24% contextual density, repeating each term 3.78 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 79 and its weakest is structure at 25, and it sits at position 28 on Google against 11 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, SEO audits, PPC, Web design. No client names on the site. Pricing: £450-£950+VAT per month.
Best for (our reading): UK practices that want published retainer pricing before the first call.
12. New Deez
Who they are. New Deez is a full-service digital marketing agency founded by Zack Mozes that sells SEO, media placement and paid campaigns across verticals. Architecture is one landing page inside a general agency offer rather than a practice area.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): general B2B and B2C.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 63 of the 172 market terms (37% coverage) over 1,628 words at 11.67% contextual density, repeating each term 2.22 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 100 and its weakest is structure at 16.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Paid media, High-authority media placement, Web design, Lead generation. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): firms that want a generalist agency and a named founder on the account.
13. Digital Shift
Who they are. Digital Shift sells local SEO and AI search optimization and states on its own contact page that it specializes exclusively in home services. The architects page is an outlier in a catalogue built for contractors and trades.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): home services, contractors, trades.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 64 of the 172 market terms (37% coverage) over 2,587 words at 9.07% contextual density, repeating each term 2.41 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 100 and its weakest is structure at 19, and it sits at position 48 on Google against 13 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Local SEO, AI search optimization, Google Business Profile management, On-page and off-page SEO, Content marketing. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): practices that want local map-pack work from a shop built around trades and home services.
14. The Gallas Company
Who they are. The Gallas Company is a small Florida SEO firm founded by Jeremy Gallas. Its architects page is written as an ultimate guide rather than a service pitch.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): private businesses, general local.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 43 of the 172 market terms (25% coverage) over 2,970 words at 8.26% contextual density, repeating each term 3.33 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 90 and its weakest is footprint at 0, and it sits at position 49 on Google against 14 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Web design, Local SEO, Partnered marketing. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): small local practices that want a one-person firm and a guide-first approach.
15. Rankpather
Who they are. Rankpather sells local SEO, Google Maps visibility and AI search readiness to small businesses. The architects page sits in a use-cases folder alongside other trades and professions.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): local small business, trades, professional services.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 42 of the 172 market terms (24% coverage) over 1,592 words at 9.03% contextual density, repeating each term 2.33 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 100 and its weakest is footprint at 0, and it sits at position 42 on Google against 15 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Local SEO, Google Maps, Technical SEO, Web design, Content. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): practices whose priority is Google Maps visibility rather than a content programme.
How to take first place on this table
The runner-up, Abstrakt Marketing Group, sits 13.1 points behind. With every other pillar unchanged, closing that gap through coverage alone means covering 56 more of the 172 terms on the published list. The list, each term’s document frequency across the cohort, the measuring script and its checksum are on the methodology page. Any agency on this table can request a re-measurement; the result is printed, with the date, whatever it shows.
How to choose an architecture SEO company
Start with whether the agency sells to architecture firms or sells to everyone. Four of the fifteen here name architecture as a practice area beyond the one landing page; one, Uncommon, works only with architecture firms. The rest run a vertical page inside a general catalogue, and that is not disqualifying, but it changes what the first call sounds like.
Ask what they will do with the portfolio. An architecture site’s project work is its largest and least-optimised asset, and turning a gallery into project pages with briefs, constraints, materials and locations is usually worth more than anything else in the first quarter. An agency that leads with blog volume has not looked at the site.
Ask about image weight before anything technical. Architecture sites are heavier than almost any other professional-services site, and compression and correct dimensions typically recover more speed than script work does.
Ask who the searches are meant to reach. A residential practice needs local visibility and fast answers on cost and timeline. A commercial practice needs qualification content a developer can read before making contact. An agency that sells the same plan to both is selling a retainer.
Then ask for the measurement. Any agency can describe its work; fewer will show a term list, a page plan and last quarter’s reporting for a comparable client. That is the artifact that separates a programme from a subscription, and it is the one thing this table cannot measure for you.
Questions to ask before hiring
Which of my project types would you build pages for first, and why those? A useful answer names your highest-fee typology and the searches attached to it. A vague answer names “services”.
What will you do with our project portfolio? Look for project pages with written briefs, not a gallery with alt text added.
How heavy is our site now, and what will you do about it? They should have measured before the call. Image compression and dimensions come before script work on an architecture site.
Do you work with another architecture practice in our market? Ask plainly. If the answer is evasive, assume yes.
What does the monthly report contain? Rankings and traffic are inputs. Project inquiries are the output, and the report should show all three on one sheet.
Can I see the term list you would write against? Every agency that runs a real content programme has one. It is the fastest way to tell a method from a retainer.
Reading the table
Five pillars make the score, and four of them measure the page. Coverage counts how many of the 172 market terms the page uses. Density passes the page’s contextual density through a saturation curve, so a page at this market’s median of 9.6% scores 49 and a page at 28% scores 74 rather than 100. Efficiency reads the repetition index and gives full marks at 3 or below, where a page’s density comes from breadth rather than from returning to the same terms. Structure reads how much of that vocabulary reaches a title or a heading. Footprint is the one pillar about the firm: branded search volume in the market’s country and Google reviews, on fixed log scales.
Three things about this instrument are said plainly. First, ProStar SEO publishes the table and writes its page against the list the table scores. That is why the list is built only from terms found on at least two competitor pages or in Semrush’s variation data for the anchor: the publisher cannot add vocabulary nobody else uses and then score itself on it. Even so, our page now covers all 172 terms, and a perfect coverage score on your own index deserves the scepticism it invites. Read it as what it is: a page written deliberately against a published list, by the people who published the list. Second, no score depends on any other row, so a competitor rewriting its page cannot move ours and ours cannot move theirs. Third, the publisher’s profile below follows the same template at the same length as the other fourteen.
Position and score disagree in both directions, and the table prints both. Denteel ranks first on Google with 14% coverage on a 674-word page. Our own page covers the whole list and does not appear in the first fifty results for the anchor. Neither is a fault in the instrument. The index measures the page; Google ranks the domain, and on this keyword the domains ahead of us are older and better known than ours.
Two facts about this edition’s list belong here. Of the 172 terms, only four appear on every competitor page, and 154 separate one page from another, so coverage is doing real work rather than counting vocabulary everyone shares. But 14 terms on the list appear on no competitor page at all: they are on it because they are Semrush variations of the anchor, which the list rule admits alongside the two-competitor test. Our page uses all 14, and our page was rewritten against this list before the edition ran. At 159 of 172 we hold the coverage maximum, which compresses every competitor’s coverage pillar against our own page. A reader who wants the harder comparison should read the coverage column as a ratio against the best competitor rather than against us: HeeDee Studios at 92 terms is the page to beat among the fourteen.