15 Best Crypto SEO Agencies 2026, Ranked by the SEO Contextual Density Index
You found this page on Google, or an AI answer sent you here.
That’s the work. We can do the same for your crypto brand.
A crypto project looking for an SEO agency meets the same page over and over: a ranking of agencies, published by an agency that put itself on top. Those pages state no method. This one states its method, publishes its constants, and scores every agency on one instrument. The SEO Contextual Density Index reads five properties of a page and of the firm behind it, and it weights vocabulary heaviest because that is what our measurements keep pointing at. For a crypto brand that means something specific: whether an agency writes about exchanges, wallets, DeFi protocols, tokenomics, staking, on-chain data, whitepapers and the compliance that shapes what a page can say, or only about SEO. The index is partial and we say so. ProStar SEO publishes this table, and ProStar SEO prints its own row at whatever rank the instrument gives it, in this edition and in every edition after, including the editions where the row sits outside the top fifteen.
The crypto SEO market, measured
Fifteen quality agencies compete for “crypto seo agency” in the United States; there are others, and this table covers the ones the live SERP put in front of a crypto founder. The anchor carries commercial intent, so unlike some markets the results are mostly real agency service pages: fourteen of them appear by position 25, and the read stopped at the standard depth of 48. We measured those fourteen plus our own, against one 128-term list built from what the competitors write about crypto, blockchain and Web3 brands.
ProStar SEO places first at 70.3, 15.3 ahead of Natural Links: 117 of 128 terms covered against 73, and 52 of them in the title or headings against 27. Those terms are the working vocabulary of a crypto project as much as of search: exchange and wallet, DeFi and staking, tokenomics and liquidity, smart contracts and on-chain data, KYC, AML and the YMYL standard Google applies to anything about money. Natural Links and Coinbound win footprint on brand search volume our page cannot match. Our page sits fortieth in the live SERP for the anchor while Coinbound ranks seventh, and the table prints both numbers without adjusting one for the other.
No score on this page is computed from another row. Each agency’s five pillars come from its own page and its own public footprint, against constants fixed before the edition ran.
The indexAI answersCharacteristicsFrenchThe 15 agenciesHow to chooseQuestions to ask
The short version
Top of the index
- 1ProStar SEO70.3
- 2Natural Links55.0
- 3Proleo51.1
The 15 agencies measured (index rank · live US SERP position, 2026-09-20)
- 1ProStar SEOpos. 40
- 2Natural Linkspos. 16
- 3Proleopos. 20
- 4Coinboundpos. 7
- 5Marqadepos. 25
- 6The Business Roverpos. 23
- 7Bird Marketingpos. 8
- 8NisonCopos. 22
- 9Tastic Marketingpos. 6
- 10Orbital SEOpos. 24
- 11HVSEOpos. 1
- 12Prosperity Mediapos. 13
- 13WebThree Consultingpos. 18
- 14MarketingCryptopos. 14
- 15Area Tenpos. 10
Full tables below: the index (ten columns) and the characteristics (twelve columns), both sortable.
Why contextual density is the yardstick
Contextual density measures how much of a market’s working vocabulary a page actually uses, as a share of its own words. It is not keyword density and it is not word count. A 6,000-word page that returns to the same dozen phrases scores lower than a 2,000-word service page that covers the crypto market’s full range once each, which is why the efficiency pillar exists alongside it.
Crypto makes the point sharply, because the vocabulary is the expertise. A founder choosing an agency asks about exchange and wallet searches, about DeFi, staking, liquidity and yield farming content, about tokenomics, whitepapers and on-chain data, about NFT and DAO launches, about digital PR into crypto publications, about KOLs on Telegram, Discord and X, about what Google’s restrictions on cryptocurrency advertising do to a paid budget, and about the YMYL standard a page about someone’s money has to clear alongside KYC and AML constraints. An agency that writes about all of that is describing blockchain work it has done. An agency that repeats “crypto SEO agency” forty times has told a crypto founder nothing about crypto.
This edition shows the cost of the opposite mistake too. The two lowest-scoring pages in the table are among the longest: a Web3 page and a crypto page that spend six thousand words circling the same handful of blockchain phrases buy coverage of nothing.
Contextual density explained in five minutes →How the index scores
Coveragedistinct list terms on the page ÷ 128, as a percentage
Density100 × CD ÷ (CD + 10); this cohort’s median of 60.6% scores 86
Structureshare of the page’s distinct list terms that also appear in the title, H1, H2 or H3
Footprintbranded search volume (US, ceiling 10,000/mo) and Google reviews weighted by rating (ceiling 500), log-scaled, averaged
Efficiency100 × min(1, 3 ÷ repetition index); at or below 3 scores 100
Bars are drawn against the heaviest signal. The five weights sum to 100.
⇅ Sortable tables: click a column header to sort, again to reverse; the # column restores the ranking. Hover a header for the metric’s definition and source.
| # | Agency | Pos. | SCDI | Coverage terms /128 | Density CD % | Efficiency rep. index | Structure placed/distinct | Footprint brand · reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ProStar SEO | 40 | 70.3 | 91.4 117 | 67.3 20.55% | 74 4.03 | 44 52/117 | 41.2 20 · 25 |
| 2 | Natural Links | 16 | 55.0 | 52.3 67 | 60.6 15.41% | 69 4.37 | 31 21/67 | 69.3 590 · no listing |
| 3 | Proleo | 20 | 51.1 | 42.2 54 | 62.9 16.93% | 90 3.35 | 24 13/54 | 60.4 260 · no listing |
| 4 | Coinbound | 7 | 50.0 | 39.1 50 | 61.4 15.90% | 85 3.52 | 26 13/50 | 64.8 390 · no listing |
| 5 | Marqade | 25 | 49.4 | 57.0 73 | 59.6 14.75% | 55 5.44 | 37 27/73 | 24.2 30 · 1 |
| 6 | The Business Rover | 23 | 48.1 | 40.6 52 | 64.3 17.98% | 68 4.38 | 48 25/52 | 33.1 20 · no listing |
| 7 | Bird Marketing | 8 | 47.8 | 42.2 54 | 55.0 12.24% | 66 4.54 | 31 17/54 | 56.9 140 · 41 |
| 8 | NisonCo | 22 | 47.6 | 39.1 50 | 57.8 13.69% | 100 2.94 | 32 16/50 | 37.1 40 · 8 |
| 9 | Tastic Marketing | 6 | 46.6 | 42.2 54 | 55.3 12.39% | 46 6.57 | 50 27/54 | 43.9 20 · 29 |
| 10 | Orbital SEO | 24 | 46.2 | 37.5 48 | 64.7 18.34% | 85 3.54 | 35 17/48 | 29.7 10 · 7 |
| 11 | HVSEO | 1 | 44.9 | 39.1 50 | 53.8 11.65% | 90 3.34 | 26 13/50 | 37.8 40 · 8 |
| 12 | Prosperity Media | 13 | 41.2 | 24.2 31 | 52.0 10.84% | 100 2.68 | 19 6/31 | 54.4 40 · 70 |
| 13 | WebThree Consulting | 18 | 40.4 | 16.4 21 | 70.1 23.47% | 91 3.29 | 38 8/21 | 33.1 20 · no listing |
| 14 | MarketingCrypto | 14 | 37.7 | 28.9 37 | 54.7 12.09% | 91 3.30 | 30 11/37 | 11.1 0 · 3 |
| 15 | Area Ten | 10 | 29.7 | 26.6 34 | 36.6 5.78% | 41 7.32 | 21 7/34 | 30.3 0 · 46 |
Who shows up in AI answers
AI presence here is a countable figure: the number of US keywords for which Google’s AI Overview cites each domain, from the Semrush index on 2026-09-20. Nothing is scored from it; it’s printed because a buyer choosing an SEO agency in 2026 wants to know who the machines already quote. Bird Marketing is cited on 200 keywords, ProStar SEO on 120. Bars are log-scaled, so a bar half as long is roughly a count forty times smaller.
Semrush “AI Overview positions”, us database: keywords where the domain appears as a cited source inside the AI Overview. A related figure, keywords the domain ranks for whose SERP carries an AI Overview, runs about ten times higher for every member and is not what’s shown here.
What you’d want to know before calling them
Nothing in this table is scored. It’s the set of facts the ranking pages on this query print about each agency, collected the same way for all fifteen and tagged by source in each column header: stated means the agency says so on its own site and the bracket links to where; public record means Google Maps or Clutch; a measured count comes from the Semrush index on the pull date. Where a fact isn’t public it says so rather than guessing.
| # | Agency | HQ stated | Founded stated | Team stated | Pricing stated | Google rating (n) | Clutch rating (n) | Crypto vertical | French published | AI Overview citations | Page-1 keywords | Notable clients as stated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ProStar SEO | Quebec City, QC | — | — | not published | 4.7 (25) | — | page only | — | 120 | 0 | none named |
| 2 | Natural Links | — | — | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 99 | 0 | none named |
| 3 | Proleo | — | — | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 2 | 0 | none named |
| 4 | Coinbound | — | 2018 [source] | 45 | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 116 | 0 | none named |
| 5 | Marqade | — | — | — | not published | 5.0 (1) | — | page only | — | 32 | 0 | none named |
| 6 | The Business Rover | Yerevan, Armenia [source] | — | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 79 | 0 | none named |
| 7 | Bird Marketing | London, United Kingdom | — | — | not published | 5.0 (41) | — | page only | — | 200 | 0 | none named |
| 8 | NisonCo | — | 2013 [source] | — | not published | 4.8 (8) | — | page only | — | 23 | 0 | none named |
| 9 | Tastic Marketing | Dallas, TX [source] | — | — | not published | 5.0 (29) | — | page only | — | 1 | 0 | none named |
| 10 | Orbital SEO | Los Angeles, CA [source] | — | — | not published | 5.0 (7) | — | page only | — | 0 | 0 | none named |
| 11 | HVSEO | Phoenix, AZ [source] | — | — | not published | 5.0 (8) | — | page only | — | 49 | 0 | none named |
| 12 | Prosperity Media | Sydney, Australia | 2012 [source] | 31 | not published | 5.0 (70) | — | page only | — | 68 | 0 | none named |
| 13 | WebThree Consulting | — | — | — | not published | no listing | — | page only | — | 6 | 0 | none named |
| 14 | MarketingCrypto | — | — | — | not published | 5.0 (3) | — | page only | — | 1 | 0 | none named |
| 15 | Area Ten | Australia [source] | — | 130 | not published | 4.9 (46) | — | page only | — | 9 | 0 | none named |
The 15 agencies in detail
One block each, same template, same length, publisher included. Screenshot is the measured page above the fold on the capture date. Facts are the agency’s own statements with the page linked; the measurement sentence is computed from the table above.
1. ProStar SEO
Who they are. ProStar SEO is a bilingual Canadian SEO agency that publishes this index. It sells SEO and GEO programmes by industry, crypto among them, and prints its own row on the same instrument as everyone else.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, iGaming, fintech, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 117 of the 128 market terms (91% coverage) over 3,143 words at 20.55% contextual density, repeating each term 4.03 times on average, which is 117 of the 128 market terms, with 52 of them reaching the title or a heading. Marqade and Bird Marketing run the next-widest vocabularies, at 73 and 54 terms. The footprint pillar is where the page loses, with 20 US brand searches a month against Natural Links’ 590 and Coinbound’s 390.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Technical SEO, Content, Digital PR and link building, GEO / AI visibility, International SEO. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): crypto brands that want a measured content programme in English or French, and an agency that publishes the measurement.
2. Natural Links
Who they are. Natural Links is a link-building and SEO firm specialising in high-competition regulated markets — fintech, crypto and iGaming — rather than crypto alone.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 67 of the 128 market terms (52% coverage) over 2,585 words at 15.41% contextual density, repeating each term 4.37 times on average, its strongest pillar is footprint at 69 and its weakest is structure at 31, and it sits at position 16 on Google against 2 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Link building, SEO, Digital PR. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): projects whose bottleneck is authority rather than content, in fintech, crypto or iGaming.
3. Proleo
Who they are. Proleo is a crypto-native marketing agency with an international remote team, selling SEO alongside PR and influencer work for token projects. It trades as Proleo LLC and publishes no country of registration, so no headquarters is recorded.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 54 of the 128 market terms (42% coverage) over 1,471 words at 16.93% contextual density, repeating each term 3.35 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 90 and its weakest is structure at 24, and it sits at position 20 on Google against 3 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Crypto SEO, Crypto PR, Influencer marketing, Community. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): token projects that want SEO bundled with PR and influencer work from a crypto-native team.
4. Coinbound
Who they are. Coinbound is one of the best-known crypto-native marketing agencies, working across influencers, PR, community and SEO. It is the cohort member with the strongest crypto brand recognition.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 50 of the 128 market terms (39% coverage) over 1,603 words at 15.90% contextual density, repeating each term 3.52 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 85 and its weakest is structure at 26.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Influencer marketing, Crypto PR, Community management, Paid media. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): brands that want the best-known crypto marketing name and are comfortable with SEO as one service among many.
5. Marqade
Who they are. Marqade sells data-led marketing with a crypto wallet SEO page, a narrower targeting choice than any other member of the cohort.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 73 of the 128 market terms (57% coverage) over 3,517 words at 14.75% contextual density, repeating each term 5.44 times on average, its strongest pillar is density at 60 and its weakest is footprint at 24, and it sits at position 25 on Google against 5 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Analytics, Paid media, Content. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): wallet products specifically, which is the only narrow targeting in this table.
6. The Business Rover
Who they are. The Business Rover is an Armenian agency, registered in Yerevan, positioning itself as an SEO firm that evolved into AI-search advocacy. Crypto is one industry page in a broader catalogue, and the buyer should know the team is not US-based despite the US-facing site.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 52 of the 128 market terms (41% coverage) over 1,644 words at 17.98% contextual density, repeating each term 4.38 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 68 and its weakest is footprint at 33, and it sits at position 23 on Google against 6 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, AI search optimisation, Website optimisation. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): brands prioritising AI search visibility, where this page places terms better than any competitor.
7. Bird Marketing
Who they are. Bird Marketing is a UK agency — Bird Marketing Limited, registered in London — running as a multi-region full-service shop with crypto as one industry page among many, alongside pharmaceutical, SaaS, telecoms and travel.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 54 of the 128 market terms (42% coverage) over 2,586 words at 12.24% contextual density, repeating each term 4.54 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 66 and its weakest is structure at 31.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Paid advertising, Social media, Web design, Branding. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): crypto brands operating across several countries that want one agency for search, paid and social.
8. NisonCo
Who they are. NisonCo, trading as NisonCo Inc., began as America's first cannabis PR firm in 2013 and extended into crypto and blockchain SEO. The regulated-vertical playbook transfers; the crypto page is an extension of that practice rather than its origin.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 50 of the 128 market terms (39% coverage) over 1,489 words at 13.69% contextual density, repeating each term 2.94 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 100 and its weakest is structure at 32, and it sits at position 22 on Google against 8 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Public relations, Content, Link building. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): projects that value a regulated-vertical track record and the cleanest writing discipline in the cohort.
9. Tastic Marketing
Who they are. Tastic Marketing is a founder-led agency registered in Dallas, Texas, that groups fintech and crypto into one industry page. The about page is written in the first person and explains the firm was started in reaction to the agency model its founder came up in.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 54 of the 128 market terms (42% coverage) over 4,043 words at 12.39% contextual density, repeating each term 6.57 times on average, its strongest pillar is density at 55 and its weakest is coverage at 42, and it ranks higher on Google (position 6) than on this index (9), which is the domain doing work the page doesn’t.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Paid media, Content, Fintech and crypto marketing. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): founders who want a founder-led shop and fintech alongside crypto.
10. Orbital SEO
Who they are. Orbital SEO is a Los Angeles agency selling audits, content and backlinks, with a crypto page inside a general local-and-national offer.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 48 of the 128 market terms (38% coverage) over 1,357 words at 18.34% contextual density, repeating each term 3.54 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 85 and its weakest is footprint at 30, and it sits at position 24 on Google against 10 here, so the page is stronger than the domain carrying it.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO audits, Content, Link building, Local SEO. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): Los Angeles brands, with the caveat about the closed listing.
11. HVSEO
Who they are. HVSEO (High Voltage SEO) is a US SEO agency whose crypto page sits inside a catalogue of industry programmes. Crypto is one vertical among many rather than the firm's specialism.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 50 of the 128 market terms (39% coverage) over 2,082 words at 11.65% contextual density, repeating each term 3.34 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 90 and its weakest is structure at 26, and it ranks higher on Google (position 1) than on this index (11), which is the domain doing work the page doesn’t.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO programmes, Technical SEO, Content, Link building. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): brands that want a general SEO programme with crypto as one of many industries served.
12. Prosperity Media
Who they are. Prosperity Media is an Australian SEO and digital PR agency in Sydney, founded by James Norquay. Cryptocurrency is one industry page inside a broader practice, and the team is the second largest in the cohort at 31.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 31 of the 128 market terms (24% coverage) over 1,187 words at 10.84% contextual density, repeating each term 2.68 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 100 and its weakest is structure at 19.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Digital PR, Content, Link building. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): Australian and APAC crypto brands wanting SEO with strong digital PR.
13. WebThree Consulting
Who they are. WebThree Consulting sells Web3 advisory with SEO attached. Its web3-seo page is the shortest in the cohort by a wide margin.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 21 of the 128 market terms (16% coverage) over 358 words at 23.47% contextual density, repeating each term 3.29 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 91 and its weakest is coverage at 16.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Web3 consulting, SEO, Advisory. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): projects wanting Web3 advisory first and SEO second.
14. MarketingCrypto
Who they are. MarketingCrypto is a crypto-only marketing agency selling turn-key campaigns that bundle SEO with PR, community and paid channels.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 37 of the 128 market terms (29% coverage) over 1,623 words at 12.09% contextual density, repeating each term 3.30 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 91 and its weakest is footprint at 11.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: Crypto SEO, Crypto PR, Community management, Paid media. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): early-stage token projects wanting one turn-key campaign across every channel.
15. Area Ten
Who they are. Area Ten is an Australian company — Area Ten Pty Ltd — selling a proprietary global performance methodology across every vertical. Its crypto page is branded "best crypto SEO agency" but reads as a general agency pitch.
Who they sell to (industries as listed by the agency): crypto, and others.
What the measurement says. The measured page uses 34 of the 128 market terms (27% coverage) over 6,233 words at 5.78% contextual density, repeating each term 7.32 times on average, its strongest pillar is efficiency at 41 and its weakest is structure at 21, and it ranks higher on Google (position 10) than on this index (15), which is the domain doing work the page doesn’t.
What they say about themselves. Services listed: SEO, Paid media, Conversion optimisation, Analytics. No client names on the site. Pricing: not published.
Best for (our reading): enterprises buying a global performance methodology rather than crypto specialism.
How to take first place on this table
The runner-up, Natural Links, sits 15.3 points behind. With every other pillar unchanged, closing that gap through coverage alone means covering 49 more of the 128 terms on the published list. The list, each term’s document frequency across the cohort, the measuring script and its checksum are on the methodology page. Any agency on this table can request a re-measurement; the result is printed, with the date, whatever it shows.
How to choose a crypto SEO agency
Start with whether the agency is crypto-native or crypto-adjacent. Six of the fifteen here name crypto as a practice rather than a landing page, and three — Coinbound, MarketingCrypto and Proleo — work in this sector and little else. The rest run a vertical page inside a general catalogue. Neither is disqualifying, but it changes who you get on the call.
Ask what they will do about YMYL. A page about a token, an exchange or a wallet is a page about someone’s money, and Google applies the standard it applies to finance. An agency that cannot explain E-E-A-T in terms of named authors, verifiable credentials and earned coverage is going to sell you blog volume instead.
Ask where the links come from. Link building in crypto is digital PR into publications and data journalists cite, not placements on a network. Ask for the last ten links they built for a comparable client and check whether you have heard of any of the sites.
Ask how they handle compliance. SEC, MiCA, KYC and AML requirements shape what a page can legally claim, and an agency that has never worked alongside counsel will write something your legal team has to kill after it ships.
Ask about AI answers specifically. ChatGPT and Perplexity now answer “best crypto exchange” directly, and the citation often arrives before the click. The AI answers section below shows how differently the fifteen perform there.
Then ask for the measurement. Any agency can describe its work; fewer will show a term list, a page plan and last quarter’s reporting for a comparable client. That is what separates a programme from a subscription, and it is the one thing this table cannot measure for you.
Questions to ask before hiring
Are you crypto-native, or is crypto one of your verticals? Both can work. The answer tells you whether they learned this market or arrived in it.
How do you handle YMYL and E-E-A-T for a token or exchange page? Look for named authors and earned coverage, not a content calendar.
Where will the backlinks come from, specifically? Ask for the last ten. Publications you recognise, or a network you do not.
Who writes the compliance language, you or my counsel? The right answer is your counsel, with their writers drafting to the boundary.
What happens to my rankings in a bear market? Volatility moves search volume more than it moves positions. An agency that cannot say that has not been through one.
Can I see the term list you would write against? Every agency running a real content programme has one. It is the fastest way to tell a method from a retainer.
Reading the table
Five pillars make the score, and four of them measure the page. Coverage counts how many of the 128 market terms the page uses. Density passes the page’s contextual density through a saturation curve, so a page at this market’s median of 9.6% scores 49 and a page at 28% scores 74 rather than 100. Efficiency reads the repetition index and gives full marks at 3 or below, where a page’s density comes from breadth rather than from returning to the same terms. Structure reads how much of that vocabulary reaches a title or a heading. Footprint is the one pillar about the firm: branded search volume in the market’s country and Google reviews, on fixed log scales.
Three things about this instrument are said plainly. First, ProStar SEO publishes the table and writes its page against the list the table scores. That is why the list is built only from terms found on at least two competitor pages or in Semrush’s variation data for the anchor: the publisher cannot add vocabulary nobody else uses and then score itself on it. Even so, our page now covers all 128 terms, and a perfect coverage score on your own index deserves the scepticism it invites. Read it as what it is: a page written deliberately against a published list, by the people who published the list. Second, no score depends on any other row, so a competitor rewriting its page cannot move ours and ours cannot move theirs. Third, the publisher’s profile below follows the same template at the same length as the other fourteen.
Position and score disagree in both directions, and the table prints both. Denteel ranks first on Google with 14% coverage on a 674-word page. Our own page covers the whole list and does not appear in the first fifty results for the anchor. Neither is a fault in the instrument. The index measures the page; Google ranks the domain, and on this keyword the domains ahead of us are older and better known than ours.
Two facts about this edition’s list belong here. Of the 128 terms, only three appear on every competitor page and 119 separate one page from another, so coverage is doing real work rather than counting shared vocabulary. But our page was rewritten against this list on the day the edition ran, cutting it from 8,096 words to 3,143 and raising coverage from 112 to 117, and six list terms appear on no competitor page at all. At 117 of 128 we hold the coverage maximum, which compresses every competitor’s coverage pillar against our own page. A reader who wants the harder comparison should read coverage against the best competitor rather than against us: Marqade at 73 terms is the page to beat among the fourteen.